🔗 Share this article

A surprising contact on the professional network. An offer of work from a headhunter, probably a female agent, based in China. The chance to make perhaps £20,000 on the side writing a handful of geopolitical reports for a firm from China peppered with “non-public” or privileged information. Compensation in cryptocurrency or physical money preferred.

It might appear clear, on this telling, that something about this method would be amiss. However, Beijing's powerful Ministry of State Security still considers it valuable to deploy recruitment consultants to try it – leading the domestic spy agency to issue multiple warnings about their operations on the internet.

Massive Contact Attempts on Social Media

In 2023, the head of MI5 Ken McCallum stated Chinese agents were contacting UK citizens on LinkedIn on an extraordinary scale, at a rate of 10,000 over the preceding 30-month period, attempting to obtain political, industrial, military and technological secrets. But a fresh initiative aimed at elected officials and parliament has prompted the spy agency to act again.

An espionage alert was distributed on Tuesday via the administrative teams of the Commons speaker and his Lords counterpart: a single slide after the persistent attempts of Shirly Shen and Amanda Qiu to reach out to Members of Parliament, peers, their assistants, economic experts, thinktanks – anyone who might provide information.

Intelligence Strategy and Legislative Changes

In the typical style of British intelligence, there was no official release of the protective guidance from MI5 or the interior ministry. But the agency knew its briefing note would leak once it was sent electronically out to Westminster. Sharing it in the media helps the wider public better identify interactions with a deceptive intent.

This warning has the effect of uncovering additional details from in and around Westminster, although that is not the agency's main objective. The service wants people in public life to understand that just because interactions on professional networks are less overtly risky as on other social platforms, it does not mean they are completely safe.

Nor is domestic spy agency understood to have been reacting to a particular event in parliament, although the burst of activity does come after the awkward failure of the prosecution of a ex-assistant an individual and his friend another person on a technicality earlier in the autumn.

Both individuals had been accused of working for the foreign power – a allegation they rejected – but inability to complete a prosecution under the since replaced Official Secrets Act led to concerns that British democracy had been left unprotected.

Revised Laws and China's Long-Term Goals

Legislation has now been changed, and the security briefing includes a reminder of its successor: “Individuals involved in spying operations risk significant legal consequences under the National Security Act.” It is a crime if somebody engages in behavior that could potentially “significantly help a foreign intelligence service”.

An obvious question, however, is what Beijing has to achieve. An elected representative who is outside ministerial roles will have restricted access of classified material, and an contact of theirs less so. But the Chinese government is also interested in the legislative body: for a period, in recent years, the UK’s China policy on issues such as the telecom firm or the human rights situation or genocide was being influenced by parliamentarians.

Cultural Differences and Ongoing Digital Threats

In part there are cultural differences as well. Authoritarian governments like China’s export information gathering methods and the size of its spy network is enormous, employing three hundred thousand individuals. Chris Inglis, a American cybersecurity head under president Joe Biden, commented it was sometimes estimated that “the Chinese have more English speakers involved in this than we [western intelligence] have English speakers”.

Beijing is prepared to develop contacts over the long term and at times even the intelligence services have struggled to distinguish between legitimate relationships and espionage. “China has a low threshold for what information is deemed to be of value,” security minister Dan Jarvis told parliamentarians on this week, but a sudden turn in the political cycle may result in an individual quickly marginal becomes important.

An alternative perspective to consider the continuous efforts at covert intelligence collection is in the wider context of the geopolitical contest between Beijing and the Western nations at a level below the level of direct conflict. China has increased its cyber operations, with the Salt Typhoon infiltration of phone and data networks in 80 countries, and the Volt Typhoon compromise of countless internet devices.

Beijing is involved in relentless attempts to find covert sources on British democracy online because it seeks to be provocative, to display influence and because it has the capability.